This article talks about how we should keep the death penalty. The writer talks about how the vilest criminals can only be stopped with the death penalty. He discusses the events revolving around Lawrence Singleton, who kidnapped, raped and attempted murder on a woman named Mary Vincent. After serving eight years in prison, he was let out on parole for good behavior. He was relocated to Florida, where he killed a 31-year-old woman. The jury recommended the death penalty, but Singleton died of cancer in prison before he could receive his punishment. He argues that if he had received the death penalty for his first crime, it could have saved the life of the 31-year-old. He explains that with our modern technology, we can avoid false accusations, and the death penalty is a viable punishment for those who commit terrible crimes.
http://www.theoaklandpress.com/general-news/20130423/death-penalty-deters-criminals-limits-suffering-guest-opinion#disqus_thread
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Current Event Debate
This article talks about how the death penalty is declining in Texas due to rulings by the Supreme Court. The rulings limit what crimes may result in the death penalty, and who may be punished. For example, the Supreme Court ruled that anyone under the age of 18 may not receive the death penalty. This has had a big impact on the decline of the death penalty in Texas, because Texas used to lead the nation in sentencing minors to the death penalty prior to the ruling. The death penalty is in decline, but it is nowhere near being abolished in the Lone Star state.
Thursday, October 16, 2014
6th Amendment Current Event
The current event I selected deals with the sixth amendment, specifically the Confrontation Clause. A man named by Antonio Vaughn was convicted of dealing cocaine and maintaining a common nuisance. The charges result in a 40 year sentence. During the trial, videos, photographs, and recorded phone calls, along with statements used during the calls, were used as evidence. However, Mr. Vaughn claimed that the evidence was "inadmissable and highly prejudicial hearsay", and violated his sixth amendment right. He also claimed that because the confidential witness did not take the stand, it also violated his sixth amendment right. However, the Court of Appeals rejected the statements, saying that the "Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment does not prohibit “the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted.”
http://www.theindianalawyer.com/admission-of-video-and-recorded-statements-did-not-violate-sixth-amendment/PARAMS/article/34645
http://www.theindianalawyer.com/admission-of-video-and-recorded-statements-did-not-violate-sixth-amendment/PARAMS/article/34645
Monday, September 29, 2014
4th Amendment Current Event
This article is about how police officers must get a warrant in order to search the cell phone of a suspect. The law was passed because cell phones may contain a ton of personal data, which police officers don't have the right to access. As Chief Justice John Roberts says, "With all they contain and all they may reveal, they hold for many Americans the privacies of life." The message that Roberts was sending was quite clear: "Get a warrant." This article relates to the Fourth Amendment because the it protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure of personal effects, such as cell phones.
http://www.theindianalawyer.com/get-a-warrant-to-search-cellphones-justices-say/PARAMS/article/34464
Monday, September 15, 2014
9/11 Hero: Pablo Ortiz
Pablo Ortiz and his family |
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Thursday, September 4, 2014
Hello World!
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Duis eu lectus eu ante vestibulum ornare volutpat dignissim libero. Donec suscipit at justo fringilla vestibulum. Donec interdum felis erat, nec molestie mi laoreet hendrerit. Nulla nec malesuada justo. Nunc finibus, neque nec dictum rutrum, sem lacus porta augue, at posuere justo urna et metus. Nullam a risus nec arcu condimentum feugiat a ut tellus. Aliquam sed sodales risus. Proin id finibus elit. Nam at mi id purus volutpat ultricies et eget dui. Quisque fringilla nulla id neque hendrerit maximus. Vivamus sodales vulputate finibus.
Sed tempor semper varius. Vivamus nec volutpat ligula. Curabitur faucibus urna eget imperdiet gravida. In pharetra faucibus purus. Vivamus ac magna volutpat massa dictum blandit. Integer feugiat ac massa sed placerat. Duis in feugiat tellus, sit amet venenatis magna.
Ut non lectus velit. Integer nec ipsum tristique, volutpat metus eget, mollis velit. Nunc ut orci vehicula, placerat turpis non, sodales lacus. Pellentesque maximus ultrices eros. Sed elit lectus, congue ac scelerisque eu, tincidunt vitae augue. Donec nec lacus convallis, sodales eros nec, interdum justo. Pellentesque sodales neque hendrerit dui lobortis, non vehicula turpis pharetra. Vivamus eleifend rhoncus nisi et consectetur. Integer finibus dolor mauris, sagittis commodo justo suscipit eget. Sed efficitur metus quis elit aliquam pellentesque.
Quisque tristique commodo lacus, ac semper quam venenatis vitae. Phasellus in magna quis leo aliquam congue sit amet et ligula. Cras sem dui, egestas quis pellentesque eget, pulvinar in nibh. Quisque et faucibus mi. Proin sagittis massa eget rhoncus tincidunt. Aenean rutrum, arcu at accumsan sollicitudin, lectus nisl suscipit lorem, non ullamcorper ligula nisl vitae dolor. Nunc consectetur sagittis laoreet. Nulla vitae laoreet risus. Suspendisse blandit nisl et nisi tincidunt posuere.
In et magna nulla. Nullam vel velit nec mauris tincidunt suscipit. Vivamus ut pellentesque quam, vel malesuada odio. Maecenas pulvinar risus vitae pellentesque consectetur. Fusce et vehicula mi, id posuere nisi. Aliquam nulla sem, hendrerit et elit non, efficitur imperdiet neque. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Duis malesuada ligula vitae tellus rutrum vehicula. Nulla sed lorem eu eros tempus volutpat.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)